Discus Fish of Cobo and Samuel Tse of Animoca Brands discuss how AI agents, digital identity and blockchain could change the way money moves.
Updated
November 2, 2026 12:03 PM
The Agentic Economy Summit at CVCF 2026 explores how AI agents and digital assets could shape the future of business and finance. IMAGE: CYBERPORT
For an AI agent to manage money on someone’s behalf, it needs more than the ability to follow instructions. It must be able to establish whom it represents, access funds and transact within agreed limits.
These are among the questions informing the discussion of AI and digital assets at Cyberport Venture Capital Forum (CVCF) 2026. Ahead of the forum, Discus Fish, CEO and Co-founder of Cobo, and Samuel Tse, Head of Investment and Corporate Finance at Animoca Brands, shared their views on how this convergence could develop—and where they see opportunities for businesses.
Discus Fish points to a longstanding challenge: blockchain can be difficult for everyday users to navigate, but AI agents may find it easier to interact with these networks.
“Blockchains have always been hard for ordinary people to use. AI agents may be better users: the chain is fully transparent and every record is traceable, which suits agents well.”
His outlook comes with a qualification. Both the agents and the networks they would use still need to develop.
“Agents aren’t capable enough yet, and chains are still adapting. But once agents truly run on-chain, the number of users and what’s possible will grow by an order of magnitude.”
Discus Fish says blockchain could reshape how financial assets are issued, traded and settled over the next five years. He also notes that institutional adoption has progressed faster than Cobo initially expected, with individual users no longer leading the shift. “Since 2017, we have believed blockchain will become part of the financial infrastructure of the future. We expected individual users to lead, but institutions moved faster.”
For Fish, the next stage involves a broader range of assets and financial clients.
“What gets redefined next is how assets are issued, traded, and settled. As traditional assets like US equities come on-chain, a much wider range of financial clients will follow.”
Samuel Tse, Head of Investment and Corporate Finance at Animoca Brands, focuses on investment opportunities across digital assets and agentic AI. He sees digital identity as essential to allowing AI agents to act on behalf of people while keeping transactions within the permissions they set.
He believes users should set clear rules for what an AI agent can do, allowing it to complete transactions without requiring approval for each one.
“Once agents can prove who they represent, hold digital assets, and move value under clear rules, the economy stops being click-by-click. You set the policy once—who, how much, for what—and the agent transacts inside it.”
He describes applications ranging from everyday payments and transfers to subscriptions, swaps and earning returns on idle funds. “That’s agentic transactions: payments, transfers, subscriptions, swaps, even chasing a better rate on idle cash. Identity is the trust layer. Assets and credentials are the spending authority—always accountable to the human who granted permission.”
In Tse’s account, the human remains the source of that authority. The agent acts within the permissions granted to it.
To illustrate how AI agents, digital identity and digital assets might work together, Tse offers a hypothetical Hong Kong parent's weekday.
“A Hong Kong parent’s weekday: top up the child’s Octopus, book a weekend football slot, translate a school notice for the helper, check weather before pickup, restock milk at the member price, and keep leftover budget earning until tomorrow.”
At present, he says, completing these tasks requires navigating services that often operate separately.
“Today that means many apps that don't talk to each other, and rails that struggle with micro payments.”
His proposed alternative brings the tasks together under instructions established by the user.
“With an agent, they set the rules once and let it decide what to do. Identity unlocks trust and member prices without oversharing. Digital assets fit the money—per-use fees, hard limits, yield until spend.”
For Tse, this combination could create opportunities across payments, merchants, identity providers and digital-asset platforms. He compares the potential scale of agentic commerce to an earlier change in how consumers accessed services.
“The iPhone in 2007 rewired how people buy and use services for 20 years. We are just at the beginning of a similar paradigm shift, with outcomes we can barely imagine.”
Discus Fish and Samuel Tse offer two perspectives on the emerging agentic economy, from the blockchain infrastructure enabling transactions to the digital identity and permissions that allow AI agents to act on people's behalf. At CVCF 2026, these ideas will become part of a wider conversation with the leaders building and investing in this evolving space.
Be part of the conversation. Join industry leaders, founders and investors at CVCF 2026 on 4–5 November and explore the technologies and opportunities shaping the next phase of business.
Exclusive for Ventureport readers: Use code cvcf26vp to access a Full Access Pass for HK$300, subject to confirmation by the organiser.
Keep Reading
Backed by Menlo Ventures, BrainGrid tackles planning gaps as AI makes software building accessible to more founders.
Updated
April 20, 2026 1:40 PM
A phone screen with app icons. PHOTO: UNPSLASH
As artificial intelligence makes it easier to write code, a different problem is starting to surface. Building software is no longer limited by technical skill alone. Increasingly, the challenge lies in deciding what to build, how to structure it, and how to turn an idea into something that actually works.
That shift sits at the centre of BrainGrid, a startup that has raised $1 million in pre-seed funding led by Menlo Ventures, with participation from Next Tier Ventures and Brainstorm Ventures. The company is building what it describes as an AI-powered planning layer for people who want to create software but may not have a technical background.
The timing reflects a broader change in how products are being built. Tools like Claude Code and Cursor have made it possible to generate working code through simple prompts. For many first-time founders, this has lowered the barrier to entry. But writing code is only one part of the process. Turning that code into a reliable product requires structure, sequencing and clarity—areas where many projects begin to fall apart.
In traditional teams, this responsibility sits with product managers who define what needs to be built and in what order. Without that layer, even well-written code can lead to products that feel disjointed or incomplete. Features may not work together, integrations can break and the final product often does not match the original idea.
BrainGrid is designed to address that gap. Instead of focusing on generating code, it helps users map out the structure of a product before development begins. The aim is to give builders a clearer starting point so that the tools they use—whether human or AI—can produce more consistent results.
The company says more than 500 builders have already used it to create software products across areas like fitness, healthcare and productivity. These range from first-time founders experimenting with new ideas to experienced developers working independently. In many cases, the products are already live and generating revenue, suggesting that the demand is not just for experimentation but for building something that can scale.
For investors, the appeal lies in the evolving role of software development. As AI takes on more of the technical work, the value shifts toward defining the problem and structuring the solution. In that sense, planning becomes less of a background task and more of a core capability.
The US$1 million raise is relatively modest, but it points to a larger trend. As more people gain access to AI tools, the number of potential builders expands. What remains limited is the ability to organise ideas into products that work in the real world. If that shift continues, the next wave of software may not be defined by who can code, but by who can plan.